proof of (the existence of) god..................

[SHATOUSHKA]

you have begun a conversation.
this is fine.
perhaps it would have suited better being on a new topic.

but you are welcome.

------------------
General Philosophy

[empiricyst]

It's kinda simple, really (and kinda not, depending on how fussy you want to get) - if we define "God" to be everything that is, as, say, Spinoza did, then God is automatically proven.

Neat, huh?

The Cyst



[This message has been edited by empiricyst (edited September 29, 2001).]

[Sapius]

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>empiricyst: God is either everything, and, therefore, Nature, or God is some some finite entity subject to the laws of causality like you and me.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

True. and I have not read Spinoza.

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Shatoush: what i am looking for is somewhere close to what (the so-called) empiricyst is describing.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

and what are they describing? I'm not familiar.



------------------
....just IMHO though.